Note: This article was cited when you look at the New York Times (July 22, 2018) as an counter that is intellectual the emerging religion of “Ancient Aliens.”
The Grand Design (2012), Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow claimed that “philosophy is dead” (p in the book. 5). They wrote: “We exist however for a short while, and in that time explore but a small part of the whole universe. But humans are a species that are curious. We wonder, we seek answers. Located in this vast world that is by turns kind and cruel, and gazing during the immense heavens above, people have always asked a variety of questions: just how can we comprehend the world for which we find ourselves? How exactly does the universe behave? What is the nature of reality? Where d > philosophy is dead. Philosophy have not kept up with modern developments in science, particularly physics.” (p. 5).
Needless to say, philosophy continues to be alive in academic journals, Amazon books, as well as the philosophy that is shrinking at the Barnes & Noble bookstores. But, as a force in popular culture, contemporary philosophy is basically dead, primarily since it has failed to keep up with the discoveries in contemporary cosmology. When you look at the wake of this stunning achievements for the Apollo program therefore the Hubble Space Telescope (just two examples), philosophy has neglected to generate a popular cosmic narrative that integrates the origins and destinies of the human species to the vast and wondrous cosmos—an expanding universe stretching across 100 billion light years and populated with 2 trillion galaxies and untold amounts of stars, planets, lifeforms, and black holes. This death began with all the crash of Apollo 8 and Earthrise.
This cosmic and philosophical failure is ev >2001: an area Odyssey (1968) and Interstellar (2014), Hollywood populates the expanding universe with endless monsters (ex: the Alien series) and apocalyptic warfare (ex: Star Wars), complimented by hardly any awe, wonder, and discovery. The Star that is recent Trek are not that distinctive from Star Wars. Here we have been fifty years after Apollo and thirty years following the Hubble telescope, while the dominant ideologies are nevertheless located in cosmic narcissism and super-specialness—pretending that is human function as the center of the universe or under the delusion that a Creator or Ancient Aliens are searching out for us.
The hit television series Ancient Aliens (2010-) has hijacked the cosmic narratives from Apollo and 2001 and claims to explain humanity’s origins and destiny in the universe in the absence of a meaningful space philosophy. In Ancient Aliens, we could see philosophy’s mediated corpse, where an attempted space philosophy and cosmic narrative have crashed and generally are still aflame in the us regarding the History Channel.
Two Val >The ancient-astronaut theory draws upon two val > may are suffering from space travel technologies that enable them to traverse the distances that are great relative ease. At least this is the “wormhole” scenario depicted in Contact (1997) and Interstellar (2014) . That sa > it is highly unlikely we’ve been visited, precisely because the distances are incredibly vast, the universe is really gigantic, and our planet is indeed tiny.
Yet, such a possibility (however slim) is the one reason why 2001 offers such a vision that is compelling of origins and destinies. Most likely, it might be an moment that is epochal find a black monolith somewhere on the planet or even the moon, beaming out a radio signal to an alert and curious species. Such a possibility is extremely popular with me, at the least the theory is that. Since the astronaut Taylor says in Planet regarding the Apes, “Out there, there has to be something a lot better than man. Has to be.” Of course, if ancient astronauts have visited Earth, they might have possessed technologies that are extremely advanced been seen as gods, angels, and miracle makers by premodern humans. Just like the apes in 2001, the humans will have looked upon the technologies with amazement and fear. But have any astronauts that are ancient visited Earth?
Where’s the monolith that is black?
Where’s the equivalent of the monolith that is black 2001 — that single artifact of indisputable extraterrestrial design or origin? Where may be the verifiable evidence that ancient astronauts or extraterrestrials visited the planet to enlighten our species, perform great deeds, and guide our art, technology, and architecture? Since i do believe extraterrestrial life forms surely exist also it’s possible some might be much more advanced and enlightened than our species, I am available to actual empirical evidence. Unfortunately, most of the ancient-astronaut theorists can point toward is a few mysterious artifacts, none of which are often linked to extraterrestrial visitations.
Where would be the “Chariots of the Gods”?
In my youth, I watched reruns or VHS tapes of 2001 and Planet of the Apes times that are many along side a number of other science-fiction films. I also recall viewing reruns of Chariots of the Gods and Mysteries regarding the Gods, which aired from the local television station. The shows are currently available on YouTube, and my recent viewings confirmed most of my original memories of those. Both films clearly attempted to connect ancient astronauts to Apollo and space exploration, with the Voyager space probe and starship Enterprise appearing early in Mysteries for the Gods. Viewing the films that are above my youth inspired us to read Chariots of this Gods?, readily available at that time in local bookstores. I viewed the films and see the book with rapt attention, precisely because von Daniken seemed to be providing “evidence” for a human narrative that was section of a bigger celestial narrative outside of the theism that prevailed in Texas, where I happened to be born and was raised (in a largely secular household). Initially, this thesis was quite attractive and did actually reflect an model that is alternative human origins and possible destinies. It seemed like a attack that is plausible the cultural and historical orthodoxy of the age, especially the pre-Copernican ideologies regarding the proselytizing evangelicals in my own suburb.
Thesis was deeply mistaken upon later reflection, however, I found myself questioning the logic of the book’s assertions and came to realize that von Daniken’s “ancient-astronaut. The book’s flaws were exposed in a 1976 Skeptical Inquirer article as well as in a written book entitled The Space Gods Revealed that featured a forward by none other than Carl Sagan.1 By 1977, Chariot of this Gods? was debunked in a BBC-PBS production of Nova in an episode called “The Case of the Ancient Astronauts.”2 The episode refuted the following claims: a picture of an astronaut that is ancient carved on a Mayan sarcophagus, the Nazca Lines in Peru were originally an ancient-astronaut spaceport, ancient astronauts inspired various carvings on Peruvian stones, and ancient astronauts built the pyramids in Egypt while the Moai statues on Easter Island.
The above mentioned assertions are one of the most ludicrous and illogical interpretations of human artifacts created by the ancient-astronaut theorists, and all are wholly unproven. The series is an attack on logic, rationality, and the nature of ev >Ancient Aliens has been on television for seven seasons suggests there are sizable audiences who are quite gullible, unable to think logically, and scientifically illiterate in many ways. Plus, there are irresponsible and intellectually bankrupt television programmers, but that is nothing new either.
In the wake regarding the Trump pres >Chariots associated with Gods? and Ancient Aliens, virtually all of the so-called ev >never be solved.
Practically all the claims of extraterrestrial influence made on Ancient Aliens assume that human civilization and consciousness have little creativity, originality, or capacity to innovate. The basic idea is that, without the help buy essay online of the ancient astronauts, humans would be helpless and could never build such great structures or make profound scientific discoveries. Plus, the show assumes there is no available room for chance, surprise, emergence, singularities, or some of the insights of chaos and complexity theory. The series represents an assault on rationality and scientific methods, not unlike all other paranormal movies and television shows in the end.